C.B.I. Theater – June 1945 (1)
Harassed and groggy after ever-increasing aerial blows, residents of Japan’s main cities once more sought shelter underground this week as Super-Forts rode high and unchallenged over the island kingdom. But, for once, the giant planes did not only unleash cargoes of flaming death. Huge paper bombardments also rained down on the cities, spraying millions of propaganda leaflets over wide areas.
Text of the leaflets was soon revealed by Radio Tokyo, which reported they were signed by President Truman and advised the Japanese people to get out of the war or face the same destruction that was accorded the German people. “Unconditional surrender,” the broadcast reported the pamphlets as reading “would not mean obliteration or slavery for the Japanese people.”
However, Uncle Sam’s airmen backed up the threats implied in the propaganda warfare with two “knockout” punches aimed at Nippon’s “glass jaw” – her concentrated industrial empire.
As Maj. Gen. Curtis S. Lemay, Commander of the 12th Bomber Command, assessed the results of last week’s destruction raids on Tokyo in an announcement that 51 square miles surrounding the Imperial Palace grounds in the heart of Japan’s capital city are “great masses of gray ashes and fire-blackened ruins of the few buildings left standing.” Super-Forts struck in force at Yokohama and Osaka.
The next day, more than 450 B-29’s returned from the heaviest daylight raid on Japan and reported giant fires were burning all over the industrial section of Tokyo’s port city of Yokohama. Later the enemy High Command conceded that “considerable damage” was inflicted and reported a high wind was spreading fires throughout the city’s automotive, aircraft, shipbuilding and rubber plants. Aerial photographs revealed that the raid, in which 3,200 tons of incendiary bombs were dropped, had burned out nearly seven square miles of Yokohama’s principal business and industrial center.
The Super-Forts were out again, this time striking at the manufacturing center of Osaka. More than 450 bombers, escorted by 150 Mustang fighters, dropped 3,200 tons of bombs. The attack was concentrated on harbor facilities, shipyards, warehouses and factories. Reports indicated that 86 square miles of Japan’s most highly industrialized city were destroyed or heavily damaged and Japanese broadcasts admitted that flames started throughout the manufacturing heart of the city were only gradually being brought under control.
The naval air force was out in strength, too. Striking on two successive days, planes attacked Southern Kyushu airfields from which the Japs have been launching suicide aerial attacks against the American fleet. Meanwhile, the Jap government announced that the entire naval air corps of Japan has been converted into a “suicide corps” for attacks against Allied warships.
***** ***** *****
The British this week announced formation of new SEAC Army, the 12th, under the command of Lt. Gen. Montague Stopford, to be based in Rangoon.
In the meantime, the 14th Army continued its mopping up operations in Burma, with the enemy making desperate attempts to keep open his escape routes to the east.
At the “Kama” escape route, north of Prome and east of the Irrawaddy River, the British killed 1,221 Japs in a series of engagements.
In the Kalaw, area Empire troops have captured a “staircase,” which goes up to the mountains northwest of Kalaw. This was rugged terrain and presented difficulties comparable to any in the entire Burma campaign.
The Japs are resisting in Burma from Pegu in the south to Mawchi Road in the north. British reports say the enemy is just as fanatical as ever in his resistance. During the week, planes of Eastern Air Command hit troop concentrations in Moulmein and attacked the jetty area in Martaban.
Click on images to enlarge.
############################################################################################
Military Humor – CBI Roundup Style –
############################################################################################
Farewell Salutes –
William Blancheri – Los Angeles, CA; USMC, WWII, PTO, Pharmacists Mate, 2/2nd Marines, KIA (Betio)
Harry ‘Bud’ Calsen – Brookfield, IL; USMC, WWII, PTO, TSgt., A/2nd Amphibian Unit, KIA (Betio)
Robert Holmes – Salt Lake City, UT; USMC, Pfc., KIA (USS Oklahoma)
Robert Kitchner – Pittsburgh, PA; US Army, Korea
Richard Murphy – Washington DC; USMC, WWII, PTO, SSgt., 6th Marines, KIA (Saipan)
Henry Sakaida – Los Angeles, CA; Civilian, Pacific War Historian, eg: “Winged Samurai”, “The Siege of Rabaul”, “Pacific Air Command WWII”
Lester Schade – Holton, WI; USMC, WWII, PTO, Captain, 4th Marines, KIA, (Enoura Maru, hellship)
Neil Simon – Bronx, NY; US Army Air Corps, (renown playwriter)
Arthur Weiss – St. Louis, MO; US Army Air Corps, WWII
Lowell “Whip” Wilson – Lynchburg, SC; US Army Air Corps, WWII, ETO, 306th Bomber Group, Silver Star
############################################################################################
Posted on September 3, 2018, in WWII and tagged Army, aviation, CBI, History, Military, Military History, Navy, Pacific, Pacific War, veterans, WW2, WWII. Bookmark the permalink. 85 Comments.
Reblogged this on Ned Hamson's Second Line View of the News.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Ned.
LikeLike
Really the horrors of war were so short!
LikeLike
I’m afraid I don’t know what you mean.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on Truth Troubles.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you.
LikeLike
“ChronosFeR2” brought me here and I am happy about it because I liked what I found.
I would like to invite you to have together a cup of tea in “El zoco del escriba” so we can keep talking about whatever you want.
Un abrazo.
Alberto Mrteh (El zoco del escriba)
LikeLike
I thank you for visiting. Chronosfer2 and I have been following each other for some time now, I need to thank him.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Do thank your friend!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
It was interesting having this post come up since I recently wrote again about the film In This Corner of the World about the Japanese domestic front.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great minds think alike, and I had finally reached the point in the war for the story to be told.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on depolreablesunite.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for sharing this.
LikeLike
Of de A bom nodig was ja dan neen daar kan ik niet over oordelen maar de enormoppervlakte en de dingen daarna slagen me met verstomming..had liever een andere oplossing gezien maar of die er was is een ?
LikeLike
De A-bom werd afgezet omdat de president moest aantonen dat de enorme hoeveelheid geld om het te ontwikkelen gerechtvaardigd was. Bovendien was het geschatte verlies aan menselijke macht tijdens een invasie in Japan één miljoen. Het was zeker niet omdat we wilden dat de steden verwoest werden, omdat ze al door andere bommen waren gefolterd en opgebrand door brandbommen.
De behoefte aan het laten vallen van de A-bom wordt nog steeds besproken.
Bedankt voor je interesse, Mary Lou!
LikeLike
Another Pacific Theater researcher has died. More info: https://www.facebook.com/PacificWrecks/posts/10155753364840382
LikeLiked by 1 person
I appreciate you letting me know. I am not a FB person, but I can read what was posted there. Mr. Innes will appear in our Salutes tomorrow (Thursday).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on John Cowgill's Literature Site.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Much appreciated, John!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Would that this had done the trick
LikeLiked by 1 person
So many things may have been different, eh?!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wonder if wounds of a surrender, however humanely done, do not fester and resurface years, even generations later. Whether it is two nations at war, or two individuals scrapping. But then, what is the alternative??
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t know that wounds ever really heal when they are passed down through the generations, but perhaps mediation can come to a compromise that will better suit both sides than one side getting “it all”.
LikeLiked by 2 people
They would not agree to unconditional surrender.
LikeLiked by 1 person
GP – All the posts I’ve made, and I had to stumble on this one when making a revision on a post about Peleliu due to YT deleting yet another video. It will be my next post… it also makes quite clear why the A bombs were needed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you. After a lifetime of reading and 6 years blogging, I wanted everyone’s opinion before I even got to that time-span again. Curiosity.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Correct. One of their main concerns was the fate of their Emperor, but MacArthur knew the Oriental mind very well and refused to put him to trial.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Excellent post, GP. It is hard to imagine 450 bombers all dropping bombs. Must have been like a firestorm.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can’t even imagine, John. Beyond my scope!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
51 square miles! Curtis Lemay and Arthur Harris must have been best buddies! I read recently that the advent of the Soviets had more of an impact than is often thought. The theory is that whereas the Japanese might have accepted well behaved Americans, the thought of the red hordes was enough to scare them into considering surrender.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Japanese were petrified of Communism!!!
LikeLike
Perhaps those in charge simply did not trust the calls for peace. We were in peaceful negotiations with the Japanese government when Pearl Harbor was attacked. In addition, if the resistance of the remaining Japanese soldiers in the Pacific Islands was any indication, a full-scale invasion of Japan would have created a horrible loss of life on both sides.
I am not going to say the use of the bomb was the right or wrong thing to do. I do, however, know that arm-chair quarterbacking always has the benefit of hindsight … an advantage not available by those making the call to use the bombs at that time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The powers that be in the beginning were Hawks and ignored calls for peace talks from the Japanese Prince. They had to get into the war for England’s sake. And Pearl was no surprise.
I appreciate your answer to the Bomb question – good reply!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know Pearl was not a complete surprise. But, many also thought the American West Coast was an intended target. This also does not change the fact that negotiations were ongoing up until the attack.
If the entire Japanese plan for the attack on Pearl Harbor were common knowledge among the American powers that be, I do not believe we would have suffered such losses. Steps would have been taken to help minimize them.
There were also pretty serious war hawks on the Japanese side as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Actually, our losses could have been far worse. It was Sunday, only a skeleton crew was aboard each ship and on base. Luck? that the aircraft carrier Lexington (CV 2) was delivering aircraft to Midway Island, and that Saratoga (CV 3) was off the California coast that morning. Luck? that poor weather delayed the return of Task Force 8 to Pearl Harbor, saving the carrier Enterprise (CV 6) and Halsey from probable destruction. Luck? that the invaluable fuel tank farm, which was loaded with aviation gas and bunker fuel, did not take a single bomb or bullet that might have set the harbor on fire. Luck? that Nagumo was more afraid of losing his force than finishing off the Pacific Fleet and its facilities on the first day of the war. Luck? that the fleet was in the shallows of Pearl Harbor that morning and not the much deeper offshore Lahaina anchorage. Had battleships like the California (BB 44) or West Virginia (BB 48) gone down there, personnel casualties would have been much heavier and salvage would have been impossible, even with the technologies of today. Luck? that the submarine base did not get hit?
Yes, Japanese had plenty of Hawks themselves, but remember FDR was putting a choke leash around them with his sanctions.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Does sound very lucky!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reading this made me wonder why and how they didn’t surrender in June rather than waiting two more months and suffering the consequences of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They were offering a stop to the war, but not unconditional surrender because they were afraid of becoming slaves. We ignored them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is fault on all sides. It’s tragic. So many more lives destroyed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
True. I’ve just been asking to get readers’ opinions after all this time. I believe tomorrow is my 6th year anniversary on this blog and was curious.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Opinions on what? The blog? The war?
LikeLiked by 1 person
The A-Bomb.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think it was a horrible mistake because so many innocent people were killed; certainly the second bomb was completely unnecessary. The US set a terrible example of mass killing that was not only immoral, but undermined whatever claim to a higher ground we ever might have had. This in my mind was a war crime if there ever was one. There could have been further negotiations that would have avoided this terrible slaughter and its environmental and political consequences.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for adding your opinion on the subject, Amy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
O.K. You force me to state plain facts – THEY started the d–n war; it was a matter of saving over one million American lives had we invaded. The bombs were very necessary.
Call it “an eye for an eye”; the enemy needs to be annihilated, so they cannot pose any further threat. Unlike the U.N. police actions since, which have slain many Americans for an obscene “status quo”; Korea is a prime example, but 58,000 dead Americans in VietNam for NOTHING is reason enough to demand unconditional surrender before we ever go to war again..
LikeLike
I respect your opinion, that’s why I’ve been asking everyone that question.
I agree with your final statement – only add that we go in with the plan to fight to win, not fight to pussy-foot around for another 18 years!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Some time ago, I found this interesting article about how ramen noodles — that staple of college kids and low-income diners — became a staple in Japan after the devastation of their industries and agriculture. I thought it might fit well with this post.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is VERY interesting, Linda, Thank You! If you don’t make a post out of it for me to reblog at the end of the war here, let me know, maybe I will.
LikeLike
Feel free — I’ll not be posting about it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Okie-dokie
LikeLiked by 1 person
Given today’s 70 years in hindsight view, there are those who will not agree with the assessment that attacking Japan with an atomic bomb was the proper decision. Those who were engaged in combat against Japan at the time and those slated for the invasion of Japan, though, would not agree. As one veteran who was there told me, the dropping of the Atomic Bomb meant my friends and I would not have to die. Sometimes I wonder how many of those today who believe it was wrong who even exist if the men who became their fathers had had to invade Japan or continue the air and naval war against it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s what I have been saying in previous comments. I know exactly where my father would have gone in as one of the first wave, so I sincerely doubt I’d be around today.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Dave Loves History.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Dave!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
While the leaflets were handwritten by a Nisei in the Military Intelligence service, the “prettiness” of the writing would indicate he may have been educated a bit in Japan but for only a few years. It is similar to our block printing.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you for contributing, Koji. I was wondering if you could translate this leaflet for us? I don’t believe it is the one dropped at this point in the war, but it’s always interesting to know was said back then.
LikeLike
I can barely imagine the devastation caused by the fire-bombing of those cities. However, my own view of that, and the later A-Bombs, was that such knockout devastating blows were necessary. Not only had the Japanese carried out appalling atrocities in China, and other countries they had invaded, they had also enslaved tens of thousands of civilians and POWs. And the prospect of a land invasion of mainland Japan would have been unthinkable, with casualties in unimaginable numbers on both sides.
My opinion is also based on the fact that my father was in India, awaiting possible orders to join the invasion of Japan, and his brother was a POW of the Japanese, suffering inhuman treatment. So, partly biased, I confess.
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Being as I know exactly where my father would have gone in, I’m glad to be here myself!!
LikeLiked by 2 people
And I am also pleased that you are here, GP. 🙂
Best wishes, Pete.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Phew! That’s makes 2 of us at least!!
LikeLike
Oh, the horrors of war!
LikeLiked by 1 person
So true, Peter, so true.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s so hard to imagine over 600 planes in the air, on the attack. I see four together at an airshow and I’m so glad they aren’t coming after me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know what you mean. I don’t care how many times I get up close to the aircraft, their size and power have me in awe.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There has been a great deal of criticism regarding both the conventional and nuclear bombing of Japan. However, it is important to remember that most of the critique ignores the causalities that were being inflicted at the same time by the Japanese army on China and Southeast Asia, and those casualties were enormous.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There was serious destruction brought on by both sides – it was a WAR. Nowadays we are so afraid of stepping on anyone’s toes, the wars go forever and nothing is settled.
LikeLiked by 1 person
As you stated in your comments above, it sure looks like the A-bomb wasn’t needed. On the other hand, the Japanese didn’t surrender even after all that destruction.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They were making calls for peace talks, just as they did in 1941, but once DC knew the A-bomb was ready to go, they ignored them. I do admit the Bomb did save many of our lives. I probably would never have existed, I know right where my father was scheduled to go in.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Looks like you are truly from a nuclear family. 😉
LikeLike
Smitty taught me to look at all sides to an argument.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s the beginning of the end. With the manufacturing facilities being bombed, they would be running short of supplies soon.
LikeLiked by 1 person
For the populace, yes. When the Allies began the occupation, they located stores and stock piles underground being stashed for an invasion.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m surprised the war was so short!
LikeLiked by 1 person
For the men in it, it sure wasn’t! Remember, the US wasn’t entirely in the war until 1942, but it had it’s beginnings much earlier.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes it had been going for some time, in fact the Japanese had been fighting in Korea and China much earlier.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Correct. Many forget that fact.
LikeLike
That’s what I’M wondering. There has to be something, doesn’t there?!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed
LikeLiked by 1 person
What an incredible bombardment. It must have been frightening for ordinary citizens. Nice to see Neil Simon’s name in the Farewell Salutes. I didn’t know he was an army man.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Simon served in 1945 at Lowry AFB in Colorado. The bombings were only going to get even worse. By looking at the pictures of the destruction of the cities, what is your opinion of the need for the A bomb to be dropped?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not much need at all from the pictures shown. 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for contributing your opinion, Ann.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Leading question. History shows the need for the A Bombs – Jap populace prepared to fight as their armed forces did, with countless lives lost.
LikeLiked by 1 person
True. The Bomb did save many lives for our side, but why didn’t the US answer the calls for peace talks that Japan was making? The did the same thing in 1941.
LikeLike